Re: [Simulavr-devel] A serial console utility

[Bill]

Hi. The build process is mine....

What version of autoconf/automake are you using? And what version of 
libtool?

My guess is you don't have libtool.

Mind you, unless you intend to develop simulavr, you are not supposed to 
need these tools.(except that we don't make tarballs that often, so you 
kinda don't have that much choice I guess...)

1.) If you just want a snapshot, I can roll one for you or we can wait 
for Klaus to chime in on when we should release an intermediate 
tarball...like simulavrxx-0.8.004???

2.) you could install libtool.

If you got this far, you hopefully noticed that you need libbfd 
installed as built by binutils when you build binutils for AVR target....


I'm game either way...


Robin Randhawa wrote:

> Hi Klaus.
>
> Thanks for the reply. I feel a lot more confident of pulling this thing off
> with avr-gdb and simulavrxx on my linux box now! :)
>
> After reading your email, I promptly checked out simulavrxx from the cvs
> repository on savannah, but am having a problem building it.
>
> Here are the steps I performed :
> 1. cd simulavrxx
> 2. ./bootstrap
>
> I get the following messages:
> + aclocal -I config
> + autoheader
> + libtoolize --force
> libtoolize: putting files in AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR, `config'.
> libtoolize: copying file `config/config.guess'
> libtoolize: copying file `config/config.sub'
> libtoolize: copying file `config/ltmain.sh'
> libtoolize: copying file `./ltoptions.m4'
> libtoolize: copying file `./ltsugar.m4'
> libtoolize: copying file `./ltversion.m4'
> libtoolize: copying file `./libtool.m4'
> + automake --add-missing --copy
> + autoconf
> configure.ac:14: error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
>      If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
>      See the Autoconf documentation.
>
> I am not familiar with the autoconf mechanisms. The only thing I can think
> of is that I am running Debian Sid with some experimental packages. Could
> some version mismatch for libtool be the problem ?
>
> Many thanks and cheers,
> Robin
>
>