Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude on Windows

[E. Weddington]

On 12 Feb 2003 at 19:04, Brian Dean wrote:

> I can really go either way on this.  In working up a split, I now
> remember why I didn't do it the first time around, and that is that no
> other routines require parallel port access outside of the generic
> parallel port programmer interface.  Thus, it doesn't make a lot of
> sense to split these routines off from a modularity perspective.  In
> fact, I think all the ppi_* routines could be declared static within
> ppi.c (except for ppi_initpgm(), but I plan to fix that shortly).

What about ppi_open and ppi_close? They get assigned to the pgm 
struct.

Eric