lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false]


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: guilev2-work [was: LilyPond boolean syntax? \true and \false]
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:14:26 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:

> 2016-01-10 21:26 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> 3. We have a branch
>>> remotes/origin/dev/guilev2
>>> Makes sense to checkout it?
>>> (It should, ofcourse, I'll test tomorrow)
>>
>> I've rebased it now, basically chucking one superseded commit.  It now
>> contains two commits that likely don't hurt, but I am also skeptical
>> that either will help.  Both concern trouble when loading utf-8 files.
>>
>> So you can git fetch again and then give origin/dev/guilev2 another try
>
> Hmm, no success for make. In LilyDev I did whats listed below
> (nonrelating stuff deleted). Did I something wrong?
>
> [build (dev/my-guilev2)]$ history 20
>    53  cd lilypond-git/
>    54  git fetch
>    55  git branch -a
>    56  git checkout origin/dev/guilev2
>
>    60  git branch dev/my-guilev2
>    61  git checkout dev/my-guilev2
>
>    67  ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
>    68  mkdir build/
>    69  cd build/
>    70  ../configure --enable-guile2
>    71  make -j3
>
> I've got:
> [...]
> /home/harm/lilypond-git/stepmake/stepmake/c++-rules.make:4: recipe for
> target 'out/source-file.o' failed
> make[1]: *** [out/source-file.o] Error 1
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/harm/lilypond-git/build/lily'
>
>
> Btw, it wasn't entirely clear to me that guilev2.x changes essential
> stuff that often.
> Exactly which guile-version are we aiming for?

The non-existing 2.0.12.  Currently, the stable-2.0 branch.  The main
challenge currently seems to be compiling LilyPond with a Guile version
that is not installed on your system.

-- 
David Kastrup



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]