[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Protux-devel] JMB map,
From: |
Remon Sijrier |
Subject: |
[Protux-devel] JMB map, |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Apr 2004 02:11:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
Me again ;-)
Jmb now makes use of a jmbMessage which has a "parameter".
This parameter however doesn't contain usefull information at the moment.
Is it the idea that this parameter should be extracted from the jmb.map?
If so, we can even make parameter all kinds of data types by specifying it in
the map like:
011 < S > (PARAMETER TYPE=INT "100") "USE SONG"
or
100 [ ER ] (PARAMETER TYPE=STRING "Hi, how are you doing?")
This is more or less urgent as Protux allready relies on this variable, so to
make Protux working again this has to be fixed as well.
At this moment there can only be one jmb action associated with an action id.
So this is not valid:
214 < S > "SELECT"
011 < S > "USE SONG"
But this (could be) valid:
214 < S >
"SELECT"
011 < S > (USE_COLLECTED_NUMBER) "USE SONG"
The text between quotes aren't parsed!
Remon
- Re: [Protux-devel] New features, some questions, (continued)
- Re: [Protux-devel] New features, some questions, Reinhard, 2004/04/23
- Re: [Protux-devel] New features, some questions, Remon Sijrier, 2004/04/23
- Re: [Protux-devel] New features, some questions, Reinhard, 2004/04/23
- Re: [Protux-devel] New features, some questions, Luciano Giordana, 2004/04/23
- Re: [Protux-devel] New features, some questions, Remon Sijrier, 2004/04/24
- [Protux-devel] OT: LAD at Karlsruhe (germany), Reinhard, 2004/04/24
- Re: [Protux-devel] OT: LAD at Karlsruhe (germany), Remon Sijrier, 2004/04/24
- [Protux-devel] Wrong concept in MJMB, Remon Sijrier, 2004/04/26
- Re: [Protux-devel] Wrong concept in MJMB, Remon Sijrier, 2004/04/28
- [Protux-devel] Comparison by object or primitive data type,, Remon Sijrier, 2004/04/28
- [Protux-devel] JMB map,,
Remon Sijrier <=
- [Protux-devel] Too much things to understand, but few to antecipate :, Luciano Giordana, 2004/04/28
- Re: [Protux-devel] Too much things to understand, but few to antecipate :, Remon Sijrier, 2004/04/29
Re: [Protux-devel] New features, some questions, Remon Sijrier, 2004/04/17
Re: [Protux-devel] New features, some questions, Reinhard Amersberger, 2004/04/27