Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 address@hidden)

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 
address@hidden)


> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: <address@hidden>
> > To: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>;
> > <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> > Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:17 PM
> > Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by
> > address@hidden)
> >
> >
> > > On 2014/08/12 13:58:44, mail_philholmes.net wrote:
> > >
> > > > The problem is the other way round.  incipit-width is not scaled
> > > > within the layout block, and so produces correct results for width.
> > >
> > > I am not convinced that the results are "correct" when they are not
> > > scaled the same as every other measure including "\mm".  Have you tried
> > > my proposal?
>
> I repeat: have you tried my proposal of treating incipit-width exactly
> the same as short-indent in scm/paper.scm?

And, for completeness, I can say: yes: I have just tried.  The result is 
that both the width of the overall incipit, and the width of the incipit 
music, are too small.  Like I said they would be.

The problem is not that incipit-width needs scaling down, but that indent 
does not.  As I said before.

--
Phil Holmes