|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by address@hidden) |
Date: | Sun, 17 Aug 2014 10:56:24 +0100 |
To: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden> Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 9:38 PMSubject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by address@hidden)
Minor typo, otherwise LGTM Trevor https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely File Documentation/notation/ancient.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode2651 Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:2651: an indication of how the initial rests and note of the original version notes https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/
No - it should be "note". A standard incipit has all the rests leading to the first note, but just the first note alone.
--Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |