Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by address@hidden)

[dak]

On 2014/08/17 09:56:32, email_philholmes.net wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <mailto:address@hidden>
> To: <mailto:address@hidden>; <mailto:address@hidden>;
<mailto:address@hidden>
> Cc: <mailto:address@hidden>;
<mailto:address@hidden>
> Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 9:38 PM
> Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by
> mailto:address@hidden)


> > Minor typo, otherwise LGTM
> >
> > Trevor
> >
> >
> >
> >

https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely
> > File Documentation/notation/ancient.itely (right):
> >
> >

https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode2651
> > Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:2651: an indication of how the
> > initial rests and note of the original version
> > notes
> >
> > https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/
> >

> No - it should be "note".  A standard incipit has all the rests
leading to
> the first note, but just the first note alone.

Beg to differ.  See for example
<URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensural_notation#mediaviewer/File:Josquin_Domine_ne_in_furore.svg>.
 It's usually the first bar or half bar, but enough that every voice has
at least one actual note.

https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/