Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by address@hidden)

[David Kastrup]

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <address@hidden>
>
>> On 2014/08/12 12:16:12, mail_philholmes.net wrote:
>>> From: <mailto:address@hidden>
>>
>>> >
>>> > Yes, I would object to scaling the dimensions of the incipit
>>> > line-width
>>> > and indent by the 1.76 factor since that is just an ad-hoc
>>> > approximation
>>> > for a single case.
>>
>>> Shame you didn't when I first asked.
>>
>> Patch 1 did not contain such an ad-hoc factor, patch 2 has been up for
>> less than two hours.
>>
>> I have no idea what I am supposed to be at blame for here.
>
> As I said in my earlier mail, my proposal to do it this way was in an
> email from July 4 to -devel.  Having had no response, I then had to
> spend a while working out how to do it.

So I am supposed to be ashamed for not working out a solution for every
problem anybody has while working with or on LilyPond?

No, I don't have 100% coverage and I don't pretend I do.

> Thus my patch with the implied OK.

If I am not on record for some topic, there is no implied OK.  In
particular not an "implied OK" for code I have not even had an
opportunity to see.

-- 
David Kastrup