|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by address@hidden) |
Date: | Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:07:55 +0100 |
Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 2:01 PMSubject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by address@hidden)
On 2014/08/12 12:16:12, mail_philholmes.net wrote:----- Original Message ----- From: <mailto:address@hidden>> > Yes, I would object to scaling the dimensions of the incipitline-width> and indent by the 1.76 factor since that is just an ad-hocapproximation> for a single case.Shame you didn't when I first asked.Patch 1 did not contain such an ad-hoc factor, patch 2 has been up for less than two hours. I have no idea what I am supposed to be at blame for here. https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/
As I said in my earlier mail, my proposal to do it this way was in an email from July 4 to -devel. Having had no response, I then had to spend a while working out how to do it. Thus my patch with the implied OK.
--Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |