Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 address@hidden)

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 
address@hidden)


"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > I am not convinced that the results are "correct" when they are not
> > > > scaled the same as every other measure including "\mm".  Have you tried
> > > > my proposal?
> >
> > I repeat: have you tried my proposal of treating incipit-width exactly
> > the same as short-indent in scm/paper.scm?
> >
> > Your example shows that short-indent (and indent and others) are
> > scaled inside of the markup \layout block while incipit-width isn't.
> > This discrepancy causes the problem.
> >
> > Have you tried my proposal of treating incipit-width exactly the same as
> > short-indent in scm/paper.scm?
> >
> > Please modify scm/paper.scm accordingly and try again.
>
>
> I've not tried, because I don't need to.

This is too silly for words.  I am going to submit your patch
appropriately modified.  I have no idea what this charade is supposed to
achieve but I have a hard time sharing your sentiment that I should be
ashamed of not working out things for you when the kind of response
I get for working them out is as rewarding as this.

--
David Kastrup


====================================================

It is not a charade.  Feel free to do as you wish, but in descending to 
describing my hard work and detailed description as a charade you sink to 
insult.

Withdraw and consider what I wrote and provided.

--
Phil Holmes