Re: [m17n-list] Add arrows

[bd satish]

Hi,

> And OPTITRANS isn't?

OPTITRANS may or may not be well-specified. It has nothing to do with ITRANS.
I guess it is your personal innovation on top of ITRANS and I respect it.

Whether Kenichi should restore hi-itrans.mim or move sa-itrans.mim is
of course left to him.
As I said, it was "IMO", yes.

--Satish

On 10 October 2013 01:39, विश्वासो वासुकिजः (Vishvas Vasuki)
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 3:29 PM, bd satish <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Those comments were probably written by you because they point to your
>> personal website. So, doesn't count.
>
> Oh - and not because they describe the behavior of the mapping in the file?
>
>>
>> Devanagari is well specified by Unicode [1] and ITRANS mapping is also
>> well-specified [2].
>
> And OPTITRANS isn't?
>
>>
>> If any new mapping doesn't relate to either of
>> them, then hi-itrans.mim and sa-itrans.mim shouldn't be touched IMO.
>
> No no - going by your logic --
>
> Kenichi should restore hi-itrans to what it was before I first touched it -
> that would conform to ITRANS. (hi-itrans most certainly does not conform to
> ITRANS. satiish yields सतीश, not सतीश् . . yields ।.)
>
> And sa-itrans was contributed by me - it diverges from ITRANS greatly too.
> So I would like it moved.
>
> --
> --
> Vishvas /विश्वासः
>