Re: [m17n-list] Add arrows

[Vish vas Vasuki]

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> wrote:

In addition, one may prefer ⇒ rather than →, then perhaps
we can add "/=>" for such a person.

That is a good point. We would want some consistency between the way to type => and -> . But, still favoring short keystrokes, I would use the />  and /< keystrokes. Attaching an altered file.

To anubhav and satish - I understand that arrows are not common in devanAgarI text online - common devanAgarI masses don't bother with sanskrit production rules (although part of the reason is the difficulty involved in typing it - in hand written notes, I use many arrows). Point is it is important / de jour for some people (eg: me), who receive messages such as:

शतशाख -> तत्करोति तदाचष्टे (धा.पा. ग.सू.) -> शतशाख णिच् -> अनुबन्धलोप
-> शतशाख इ -> 6-4-48 अतो लोपः -> उपधालोप -> शतशाख् इ -> शतशाखि ->
3-1-32 सनाद्यन्ता धातवः -> 3-4-69 लः कर्मणि च भावे चाकर्मकेभ्यः ->
3-2-123 वर्तमाने लट् -> शतशाखि लट् -> 3-4-78
तिप्तस्झिसिप्थस्थमिब्वस्मस्तातांझथासाथांध्वमिड्वहिमहिङ् -> शतशाखि झि
-> 3-1-68 कर्तरि शप्‌ -> शतशाखि शप् झि -> अनुबन्धलोप -> शतशाखि अ झि ->
3-4-113 तिङ्शित्सार्वधातुकम् -> 7-3-84 सार्वधातुकार्धधातुकयोः -> गुण
-> शतशाखे अ झि -> 6-1-78 एचोऽयवायावः -> शतशाखय् अ झि -> शतशाखय झि ->
7-1-3 झोऽन्तः -> शतशाखय अन्ति -> 6-1-97 अतो गुणे -> पररूप ->
शतशाखयन्ति

Let people who don't want to type arrows not use them -If it does not bother them, there is not reason not to include that convenience.

--
--
Vishvas /विश्वासः

hi-itrans.mim
Description: Binary data