[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eclipse
From: |
Arnaud Vandyck |
Subject: |
Re: Eclipse |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:14:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:39:12 +0200,
Michael Koch <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2004 10:23 schrieb Arnaud Vandyck:
[...]
>> Yes, other worst alternatives exist. Also, note that GNU JAXP
>> release cycle is not the same as classpath; and if we really want a
>> separate module, I suppose it's possible to add some instructions
>> to the make dist target or something.
>
> The question is: Does GNU JAXP wants/needs an extra release cylce when
> its merged ? Personally I think thats a bad idea.
Not a different release cycle, but if some people wants GNU JAXP but not
all GNU CLASSPATH, maybe it could be kind to ship a separate module when
it has evolved.
--
Arnaud Vandyck
,= ,-_-. =.
((_/)o o(\_))
`-'(. .)`-'
\_/
- Re: Eclipse, (continued)
- Re: Eclipse, Michael Koch, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Dalibor Topic, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Michael Koch, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Tom Tromey, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Tom Tromey, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Dalibor Topic, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Chris Burdess, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Dalibor Topic, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Arnaud Vandyck, 2004/10/26
- Re: Eclipse, Michael Koch, 2004/10/26
- Re: Eclipse,
Arnaud Vandyck <=
- GNU JAXP integration and what should be in 1.0?, Mark Wielaard, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Per Bothner, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Tom Tromey, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Stuart Ballard, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Dalibor Topic, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Tom Tromey, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Dalibor Topic, 2004/10/25
Re: Eclipse, Tom Tromey, 2004/10/25