[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eclipse
From: |
Michael Koch |
Subject: |
Re: Eclipse |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 10:39:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
Am Dienstag, 26. Oktober 2004 10:23 schrieb Arnaud Vandyck:
> Mon, 25 Oct 2004 21:10:17 +0100,
>
> Chris Burdess <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Dalibor Topic wrote:
> >> I, too, want to see GNU JAXP integrated into GNU Classpath.
>
> [...]
>
> > Moving GNU JAXP to the Classpath project is not a problem for the
> > current JAXP developers.
> >
> > Note on modularisation: as I understand it GNU JAXP is only
> > really used by Classpath and the various free JVM implementations
> > (libgcj, kaffe, etc), which already use Classpath or are
> > attempting to unify their code with it.
>
> Yes, other worst alternatives exist. Also, note that GNU JAXP
> release cycle is not the same as classpath; and if we really want a
> separate module, I suppose it's possible to add some instructions
> to the make dist target or something.
The question is: Does GNU JAXP wants/needs an extra release cylce when
its merged ? Personally I think thats a bad idea.
Michael
--
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
- Re: Eclipse, (continued)
- Re: Eclipse, Arnaud Vandyck, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Michael Koch, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Dalibor Topic, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Michael Koch, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Tom Tromey, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Tom Tromey, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Dalibor Topic, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Chris Burdess, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Dalibor Topic, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Arnaud Vandyck, 2004/10/26
- Re: Eclipse,
Michael Koch <=
- Re: Eclipse, Arnaud Vandyck, 2004/10/26
- GNU JAXP integration and what should be in 1.0?, Mark Wielaard, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Per Bothner, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Tom Tromey, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Stuart Ballard, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Dalibor Topic, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Tom Tromey, 2004/10/25
- Re: Eclipse, Dalibor Topic, 2004/10/25
Re: Eclipse, Tom Tromey, 2004/10/25