Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

chicken-users (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Mon Oct 31 2005 17:02:57 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• October 31, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Callback nightmare, Tony Garnock-Jones, 17:02
  • [Chicken-users] Choosing between FFI approaches, Peter BARABAS, 16:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C unions and structs, how to access them ?, Pupeno, 10:44
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Callback nightmare, felix winkelmann, 02:08
  • Re: [Chicken-users] More on Unions and Structs., felix winkelmann, 01:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] C unions and structs, how to access them ?, felix winkelmann, 01:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] define-foreign-type, felix winkelmann, 01:44
  • [Chicken-users] More on Unions and Structs., Pupeno, 01:26
• October 30, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] C unions and structs, how to access them ?, Pupeno, 15:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Callback nightmare, Tony Garnock-Jones, 05:40
• October 29, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Callback nightmare, Pupeno, 15:58
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Callback nightmare, Tony Garnock-Jones, 15:16
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Callback nightmare, Pupeno, 15:02
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Callback nightmare, Tony Garnock-Jones, 14:00
  • [Chicken-users] define-foreign-type, Pupeno, 03:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Callback nightmare, Pupeno, 03:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Callback nightmare, Tony Garnock-Jones, 01:36
  • [Chicken-users] Callback nightmare, Pupeno, 00:03
• October 28, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] ARM build, john, 18:23
  • [Chicken-users] Scheme UK Meeting: 7 December 2005, Noel Welsh, 09:20
• October 27, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] chicken and native threads?, felix winkelmann, 06:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] udp.scm on cygwin, felix winkelmann, 06:28
• October 26, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] udp.scm on cygwin, Daishi Kato, 11:01
• October 25, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] chicken and native threads?, Raffael Cavallaro, 15:03
  • RE: [Chicken-users] avoiding memory leaks, Andrey Fomichev, 13:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Brandon J. Van Every, 05:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] avoiding memory leaks, felix winkelmann, 01:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] udp.scm on cygwin, felix winkelmann, 01:22
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, felix winkelmann, 01:16
• October 24, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Brandon J. Van Every, 17:45
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Patrick Brannan, 09:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Graham Fawcett, 09:29
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Brandon J. Van Every, 06:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, felix winkelmann, 05:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, felix winkelmann, 05:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, felix winkelmann, 05:33
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, felix winkelmann, 05:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Brandon J. Van Every, 00:29
• October 22, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] udp.scm on cygwin, Daishi Kato, 23:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Patrick Brannan, 22:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Brandon J. Van Every, 02:45
• October 21, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Graham Fawcett, 21:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Brandon J. Van Every, 17:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] CMake testing, Graham Fawcett, 15:36
  • [Chicken-users] avoiding memory leaks, Andrey Fomichev, 07:28
  • [Chicken-users] avoiding memory leaks, Andrey Fomichev, 04:24
  • [Chicken-users] CMake testing, felix winkelmann, 03:31
• October 19, 2005
  • RE: [Chicken-users] embedding doen't work, Andrey Fomichev, 09:40
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problems with #e and #i in the numeric egg, felix winkelmann, 07:18
• October 18, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Problems with #e and #i in the numeric egg, John.Cowan, 17:24
• October 17, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] bb!, felix winkelmann, 14:06
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken/egg version mismatch, Peter Bex, 08:45
  • [Chicken-users] bb!, John, 08:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken/egg version mismatch, felix winkelmann, 06:17
• October 16, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Chicken/egg version mismatch, Peter Bex, 12:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] embedding doen't work, felix winkelmann, 02:45
• October 15, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] embedding doen't work, Andrey Fomichev, 08:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] FastCGI?, felix winkelmann, 07:29
  • RE: [Chicken-users] Error compiling chicken 2.2 on Windows, Andrey Fomichev, 07:08
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Error compiling chicken 2.2 on Windows, felix winkelmann, 06:51
  • [Chicken-users] Error compiling chicken 2.2 on Windows, Andrey Fomichev, 06:16
• October 14, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Re: FastCGI?, Reed Sheridan, 21:49
  • Re: [Chicken-users] home for egg-repository needed..., Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 04:08
• October 13, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] FastCGI?, Giovanni Pensa, 16:56
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Testing at runtime for the presence of eggs?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 08:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, John.Cowan, 08:18
  • [Chicken-users] home for egg-repository needed..., felix winkelmann, 02:06
  • Re: [Chicken-users] numbers egg slow?, Alex Shinn, 01:47
• October 12, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Next round of egg-updates, felix winkelmann, 15:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, felix winkelmann, 08:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] numbers egg slow?, Daishi Kato, 05:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, Daishi Kato, 04:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, Alex Shinn, 03:17
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, felix winkelmann, 02:55
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Testing at runtime for the presence of eggs?, felix winkelmann, 02:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, Alex Shinn, 02:40
  • [Chicken-users] Testing at runtime for the presence of eggs?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 02:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, Daishi Kato, 02:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, felix winkelmann, 02:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, felix winkelmann, 02:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, Daishi Kato, 01:54
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, Alex Shinn, 01:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, felix winkelmann, 01:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] numbers egg slow?, Daishi Kato, 01:33
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, Daishi Kato, 01:20
• October 10, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] OpenSSL bindings, Thomas Chust, 14:14
  • Re: [Chicken-users] OpenSSL bindings, felix winkelmann, 06:01
  • Re: [Chicken-users] OpenSSL bindings, Thomas Chust, 05:13
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Significant overhead to simple-macros?, Raffael Cavallaro, 02:28
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Significant overhead to simple-macros?, felix winkelmann, 01:52
  • Re: [Chicken-users] OpenSSL bindings, felix winkelmann, 01:00
• October 09, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] OpenSSL bindings, Thomas Chust, 19:59
• October 07, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] i18n for Scheme programs?, Thomas Chust, 10:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Significant overhead to simple-macros?, Raffael Cavallaro, 09:19
  • Re: [Chicken-users] i18n for Scheme programs?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 02:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] i18n for Scheme programs?, felix winkelmann, 02:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] i18n for Scheme programs?, Alex Shinn, 02:26
  • Re: [Chicken-users] numbers egg slow?, Alex Shinn, 02:16
  • [Chicken-users] new eggs, felix winkelmann, 02:15
  • Re: [Chicken-users] OpenSSL bindings, felix winkelmann, 02:11
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, felix winkelmann, 02:10
  • Re: [Chicken-users] i18n for Scheme programs?, felix winkelmann, 02:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Significant overhead to simple-macros?, felix winkelmann, 02:00
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Conflict between simple-macros and other extensions?, felix winkelmann, 01:57
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), felix winkelmann, 01:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Wierd error running chicken, felix winkelmann, 01:43
• October 06, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] syntax-case Egg license, felix winkelmann, 20:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] bug in (hash-table-exists?), felix winkelmann, 20:22
  • [Chicken-users] i18n for Scheme programs?, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 15:21
  • Re: [Chicken-users] numbers egg slow?, Daishi Kato, 08:54
  • [Chicken-users] Significant overhead to simple-macros?, Raffael Cavallaro, 08:40
  • [Chicken-users] syntax-case Egg license, Brandon J. Van Every, 05:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] numbers egg slow?, Daishi Kato, 02:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] numbers egg slow?, Daishi Kato, 02:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] numbers egg slow?, Alex Shinn, 02:29
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ajax egg, Daishi Kato, 02:23
  • Re: [Chicken-users] OpenSSL bindings, Thomas Chust, 02:04
  • Re: [Chicken-users] numbers egg slow?, Daishi Kato, 01:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, Daishi Kato, 01:11
• October 05, 2005
  • [Chicken-users] Wierd error running chicken, John Lenz, 21:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] OpenSSL bindings, Graham Fawcett, 19:39
  • [Chicken-users] bug in (hash-table-exists?), Daniel B. Faken, 16:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Peter Keller, 12:51
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), F. Wittenberger, 12:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Peter Keller, 12:16
  • [Chicken-users] OpenSSL bindings, Thomas Chust, 10:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] stream trouble, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 09:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), F. Wittenberger, 09:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Graham Fawcett, 09:10
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), F. Wittenberger, 07:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Thomas Chust, 05:27
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), F. Wittenberger, 05:22
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), F. Wittenberger, 05:17
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Thomas Chust, 05:15
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), F. Wittenberger, 05:13
• October 04, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Peter Keller, 23:44
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Brandon J. Van Every, 22:32
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Conflict between simple-macros and other extensions?, Alex Shinn, 21:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Thomas Chust, 18:19
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Peter Keller, 17:02
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Ed Watkeys, 15:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Graham Fawcett, 15:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Conflict between simple-macros and other extensions?, Graham Fawcett, 15:39
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Peter Keller, 15:03
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Graham Fawcett, 14:49
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Will M. Farr, 14:33
  • [Chicken-users] Async IO (was Re: libcurl?), Graham Fawcett, 13:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] libcurl?, Michele Simionato, 11:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] libcurl?, Thomas Chust, 11:59
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Conflict between simple-macros and other extensions?, Thomas Chust, 11:53
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Conflict between simple-macros and other extensions?, Graham Fawcett, 10:37
  • Re: [Chicken-users] libcurl?, Peter Keller, 09:48
  • Re: [Chicken-users] libcurl?, Thomas Chust, 09:41
  • Re: [Chicken-users] stream trouble, Shawn Rutledge, 03:06
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, felix winkelmann, 02:18
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Patrick Brannan, 00:03
• October 03, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Patrick Brannan, 23:47
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated crypt.egg, Thomas Chust, 17:46
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated crypt.egg, Kon Lovett, 16:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] libcurl?, felix winkelmann, 16:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 16:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] stream trouble, Alejandro Forero Cuervo, 16:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Conflict between simple-macros and other extensions?, felix winkelmann, 16:31
  • Re: [Chicken-users] stream trouble, felix winkelmann, 15:54
  • [Chicken-users] Updated eggs, felix winkelmann, 15:50
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Updated crypt.egg, felix winkelmann, 15:36
  • Re: [Chicken-users] Problem w/ my egg, felix winkelmann, 15:35
  • Re: [Chicken-users] numbers egg slow?, felix winkelmann, 15:16
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Thomas Chust, 15:06
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ajax egg, Thomas Chust, 15:04
  • [Chicken-users] Re: Problem w/ srfi-47.scm, felix winkelmann, 15:04
  • [Chicken-users] Conflict between simple-macros and other extensions?, Raffael Cavallaro, 14:38
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Patrick Brannan, 11:49
  • Re: [Chicken-users] ajax egg, Daishi Kato, 10:33
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Brandon J. Van Every, 06:43
• October 02, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Tony Garnock-Jones, 17:10
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Ashley Bone, 09:13
• October 01, 2005
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Thomas Chust, 18:06
  • Re: [Chicken-users] -O3 wierdness, Thomas Chust, 18:05
  • [Chicken-users] -O3 wierdness, Mario Domenech Goulart, 15:34
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Brandon J. Van Every, 12:12
  • Re: [Chicken-users] alternate build tools, Thomas Chust, 09:36

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc