[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:
From: |
Doug Kaufman |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Nov 1999 18:14:55 -0800 (PST) |
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Klaus Weide wrote:
> Everyone who compiles on/for Unix uses the configure script. So all
> those folks shouldn't edit userdefs.h?
>
> Well maybe the "typical" user is better off doing either one or the
> other. (Which on Unix means "don't touch userdefs.h".) I still don't
> see why mixing should be actively discouraged.
There are still a number of settings which are generally configured
in userdefs.h, even after configure is used, and which can not be set
in lynx.cfg (unless I am confused, which is certainly possible). I
believe that "NO_ANONYMOUS_EMAIL" is only in userdefs.h, along with
default "TEMP_SPACE" setting.
Doug
__
Doug Kaufman
Internet: address@hidden
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Larry W. Virden, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/23