[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:
From: |
T.E.Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg: |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Nov 1999 21:24:46 -0500 (EST) |
>
> > There are still a number of settings which are generally configured
> > in userdefs.h, even after configure is used, and which can not be set
> ^^^^^
> I always edit userdefs.h _before_ running the configure script. Is it
> irrelevant whether one edits userdefs.h before or after?
yes (order does not matter, since userdefs.h isn't used during the configure
process - though in principal it could be: for tin's configure script I found
it worked best to make compile-checks including tin's header files, but _that_
was to make the missing-prototype checks work).
> __Henry
--
Thomas E. Dickey
address@hidden
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Larry W. Virden, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/22
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, T.E.Dickey, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:, Henry Nelson, 1999/11/23
- Re: lynx-dev (patch) userdefs.h & lynxcfg:,
T.E.Dickey <=