[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal
From: |
Juliusz Chroboczek |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix] |
Date: |
05 Apr 2004 16:33:22 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
>> I spent a few years working on a 300 MB tree with a laptop with 4
>> GB local disk, typically none of which was free; that would not
>> have been possible with arch.)
TL> Depends what you're doing. You have room for 13 copies of that tree
TL> on your laptop. Arch can keep you quite happy within that
TL> constraint.
Except that, with the tree checked out and compiled, the laptop had
exactly 0 free space.
TL> For simple hack/commit usage, you can by with just 2 copies (3
TL> transiently)
In my case, that's 1 GB instead of 300 MB, right?
Partial solutions to the problem:
- a ``tla export'' that doesn't require any extra space;
- the ability to do ``tla get'' and ``tla export'' on a subtree;
- the ability to do ``tla commit'' when you've only got a subtree.
Not an urgent request, though, I'm pretty happy with arch as it stands.
Juliusz
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix],
Juliusz Chroboczek <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], James Blackwell, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] cscvs version splitting [was Re: Working out a branching scheme], Charles Duffy, 2004/04/05
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/05
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/05
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Miles Bader, 2004/04/05
- [Gnu-arch-users] tla export [was: Working out...], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/06