Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: Ideas and questions.

[Jon Bright]

Hi,

Nathan Myers wrote:
> I don't know any reason for its name to be particularly short.
> Nobody will type the name under any normal circumstances, right?  
> If it were ".monotone-metadata" would anyone be inconvenienced?

It should be short if it's not .-prefixed, to avoid widening ls 
listings.  If it's .-prefixed, it should still be not-insanely-long - 
Windows doesn't hide things with . prefixes.  My personal preference 
would probably be ".monotone", which I think describes it fine and 
shouldn't inconvenience anyone.

--
Jon Bright
Silicon Circus Ltd.
http://www.siliconcircus.com