Re: [Gomp-discuss] Open64's implementation of OpenMP

[Diego Novillo]

On Tue, 04 Feb 2003, Biagio Lucini wrote:

> This syntax is (almost) shared by the pragmas
> 
> omp parallel
> omp parallel for
> omp parallel sections
> 
> Somehow simpler are the "omp sections" and "opm for", but just because
> they are "sub-pragmas" of "opm parallel". 
> 
Thanks.  It shouldn't be a huge deal.  Then again, I won't be the
one making those changes :)


Diego.