Re: [Gomp-discuss] Open64's implementation of OpenMP

[Steven Bosscher]

Op di 04-02-2003, om 18:44 schreef Diego Novillo:
> On Tue, 04 Feb 2003, Biagio Lucini wrote:
> 
> > This syntax is (almost) shared by the pragmas
> > 
> > omp parallel
> > omp parallel for
> > omp parallel sections
> > 
> > Somehow simpler are the "omp sections" and "opm for", but just because
> > they are "sub-pragmas" of "opm parallel". 
> > 
> Thanks.  It shouldn't be a huge deal.  Then again, I won't be the
> one making those changes :)

The hardest part is making sure that whatever follows the pragma is
legal.  You don't want to write your own 'for'-parser just for OpenMP,
but OpenMP directives restrict the syntax of such statements.  There are
similair examples.

I don't have a clue how this would have to be dealt with, and if no-one
on this list does, I guess we'll have to ask on the gcc mailing list.  

Greetz
Steven