Re: [ruby-tut] some points

[Laurent Sansonetti]

On Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:42:24 +0200 (CEST)
gabriele renzi <address@hidden> wrote:

> - why don't use an xml entity for IRB or "nil"? kinda
> like
> <!ENTITY IRB        "<command>IRB</command>">?
> (untested)
> 

This is a good idea.  I will add this entity, and update my work as soon as 
possible.

> (damn, why nobody loves urpmi? :)

I will update the appendix.  Sorry, I was not aware of this command,
since I'm a FreeBSD user ;-)

> - suggested change fot appendix.xml (2)
>  maybe we should refer to windows installers
> (rubyinstaller.sf.net)
> 

Yes, you're right.  In fact, the windows installer is already refered in 
Daniel's version (3.0).  My appendix and his (*) are not synchronized yet.

* : is it good English?  (mine, yours, his...) ?

> - suggested change fot appendix.xml (3)
>  should we refer to comp.lang.ruby (newsgroup side of
> ruby-talk)? 
> 

I don't think it is important to mention the newsgroup, since usenet messages 
are directly delivered to the ruby-talk mailing-list.

Daniel, Robert?  

-- 
Laurent