Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue address@hidden)

[David Kastrup]

"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>;
> <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 3:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue
> address@hidden)
>
>
> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> > Let's see if anyone else has an opinion.
>
>> About what?
>
> About whether it's

What is "it"?

> sufficiently a problem to prevent any further updates to the ancient
> music documentation, which is what it's doing.

What is "it" here?

> Please stop further debate, let others comment.

On what?

> If no-one does, then no-one else shares your concern.

I would have written "or yours", but since you do not even bother giving
a reason why instrument names should be aligned differently in the
presence of incipits, it is not even clear what your concern is.  Maybe
it's "reviews are a hassle".  I can agree with that.

-- 
David Kastrup