[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Apr 2004 06:43:47 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Neil Stevens <address@hidden>
> On Friday April 02, 2004 10:26 am, Tom Lord wrote:
> > A total history containing 11K revisions is no sweat for arch. A
> > total history containing 100K revisions is no sweat. Putting all
> > those revisions in a single arch version? You're moving into the area
> > of using arch poorly.
> This answer reminds me of an old joke:
> "My arm hurts if I do this."
> "So don't do that!"
> I don't get the impression that you're joking, though.
You mean that I'm _not_ joking? Yes, that's right. Seriously, by
the time you get to 100k revisions in a single development line, do
some archive cycling in there.
Not just for performance but also for administration and for user
convenience. If you split up that line across a few archives you can
more easily put the first 90k revisions on read-only media, ignore
them during backup traversals, etc. The output of commands like
`tla revisions -s' will be much more useful, etc.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Miles Bader, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme, Neil Stevens, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/04