[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --f
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix] |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Apr 2004 21:44:46 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Miles Bader <address@hidden>
> On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:42:17PM -0800, Dustin Sallings wrote:
> > This model makes a lot of sense to me, but you end up with a
really
> > large number of patches in a branch, which arch doesn't seem to handle
> > very efficiently.
> It does fine if you use the typical techniques (my biggest branch has
about
> 400 patches, with no issues at all; I don't see any problem with going
into
> the thousands at least).
> Once the back/optimized-building stuff gets added, things should be even
> better (cacherevs will start to be even more useful, and revlibs will work
> even better).
Thousands and beyond. To be fair, there's a few obscure optimizations
that will have to come on line as these edge cases get exercised but,
once we're into a few thousands of changesets in a version --- if your
project has more than that in a given year then you are probably out
of control.
(Of course, the sum of commits across _branches_ should scale, in
essense, infinitely.)
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Robin Farine, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Juliusz Chroboczek, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Miles Bader, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix],
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/02
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme, Neil Stevens, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme, Tom Lord, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Tom Lord, 2004/04/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Working out a branching scheme [was: tag --seal --fix], Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/02