[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did neverfinish s
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did neverfinish sending |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:15:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
As Weddington, Eric wrote:
> And honestly, I would rather that avrdude got rid of those shortcut
> aliases, as it just confuses the end user. I would rather that it
> accepts the full lowercase name like avr-gcc, and possibly the full
> canonical (mixed case) name.
It does all this, and has always been doing so. ;-)
The shorthand names are really only meant as a simplification for
people manually entering them on the commandline, and nobody forces
anyone to use them ;). When being called from a Makefile, we always
used the long names (from the MCU_TYPE make macro).
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did never finish sending, Petr Hluzin, 2009/12/20
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did never finish sending, ThomasK, 2009/12/21
- Message not available
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did never finish sending, Petr Hluzín, 2009/12/21
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did never finish sending, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/12/22
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did never finish sending, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/12/22
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did neverfinish sending, Weddington, Eric, 2009/12/22
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did neverfinish sending,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, didneverfinish sending, Weddington, Eric, 2009/12/22
Message not available