[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did neverfinish s
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did neverfinish sending |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:25:05 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> u.org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 10:20 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized
> HWUart, did neverfinish sending
>
> As Petr Hluzín wrote:
>
> > Because the ATmegaXX is the canonical (manufacturer's) name. The
> > processor's name is ATmega16, not atmega16. A compiler, simulator,
> > etc are not in position to reject official names.
>
> OTOH, the lowercase form has been in use in the AVR-GCC toolchain all
> the time, and the compiler only accepts it as lowercase. But of
> course, I wouldn't mind if other tools accepted it in any case.
>
> > By the way avrdude uses (and used to require) a "code" of m16 for
> > that chip. What about requiring "m16"?
>
> AVRDUDE only offers that as a shortcut alias. It accepts the long
> name as well, and it is case independant when accepting the name.
And honestly, I would rather that avrdude got rid of those shortcut aliases, as
it just confuses the end user. I would rather that it accepts the full
lowercase name like avr-gcc, and possibly the full canonical (mixed case) name.
It's not like these device names are incredibly long that they need to be
abbreviated.
- [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did never finish sending, Petr Hluzin, 2009/12/20
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did never finish sending, ThomasK, 2009/12/21
- Message not available
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did never finish sending, Petr Hluzín, 2009/12/21
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did never finish sending, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/12/22
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did never finish sending, Klaus Rudolph, 2009/12/22
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did neverfinish sending,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, did neverfinish sending, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/12/22
- RE: [Simulavr-devel] [patch #7032] unitialized HWUart, didneverfinish sending, Weddington, Eric, 2009/12/22
Message not available