RE: [Paparazzi-devel] IMU with Tiny 2

[akochevar]

you are correct.  Look out using the ADCs on the Arm7, they are 10 bit only.  You may need to play some tricks to filter out the signals because they are analog, and EMI considerations are a must.  It can be done though.  Then yes its as simple as replacing the infrared.c removing the -DIR flag and putting in your own IMU stuff.  Its been done, it can be done, and its a great software excercise for someone learning paparazzi.

AJ

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] IMU with Tiny 2
> From: sina parastgary <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, June 28, 2008 1:58 am
> To: address@hidden
>
> I want to use an IMU with classix.i decide to use analog signals on IMU board in connect with autopilot ADCs.clearly i must insert kalman filter in infrared.c to use IMU instead of IRsensor on ADCs.
> i think it doesn't need more changes in software.
>
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Mohit Mundhra
> > <mundhra@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Is anyone using an IMU board instead of the IR Sensors
> > for some fixed wing
> > > aircraft? If not, can anyone give some estimates of
> > what all work needs to
> > > be done on the software and hardware part to integrate
> > it with Tiny.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mohit Mundhra
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > > Paparazzi-devel@nongnu.org
> > >
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> > Paparazzi-devel@nongnu.org
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
>       
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> Paparazzi-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel