> you are correct. Look out using the ADCs on the Arm7, they
> are 10 bit only. You may need to play some tricks to
> filter out the signals because they are analog, and EMI
> considerations are a must. It can be done though. Then
> yes its as simple as replacing the infrared.c removing the
> -DIR flag and putting in your own IMU stuff. Its been
> done, it can be done, and its a great software excercise
> for someone learning paparazzi.
>
> AJ
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
>
> Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] IMU with Tiny 2
>
> From: sina parastgary <
address@hidden>
>
> Date: Sat, June 28, 2008 1:58 am
>
> To:
address@hidden>
>
>
> I want to use an IMU with classix.i decide to use analog
> signals on IMU board in connect with autopilot ADCs.clearly
> i must insert kalman filter in infrared.c to use IMU instead
> of IRsensor on ADCs.
>
> i think it doesn't need more changes in software.
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 3:21 AM, Mohit Mundhra
>
> > <
address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > Is anyone using an IMU board instead of the IR
> Sensors
>
> > for some fixed wing
>
> > > aircraft? If not, can anyone give some estimates
> of
>
> > what all work needs to
>
> > > be done on the software and hardware part to
> integrate
>
> > it with Tiny.
>
> > >
>
> > > --
>
> > > Mohit Mundhra
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > > _______________________________________________
>
> > > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>
> > >
address@hidden>
> > >
>
> >
>
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel>
> > >
>
> > >_______________________________________________
>
> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>
> >
address@hidden>
> >
>
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>
>
address@hidden>
>
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hiddenhttp://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel