nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Problem with mhl.format


From: aalinovi
Subject: Re: Problem with mhl.format
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 07:14:04 -0500

In message <20220215152817.3744F22192@orac.inputplus.co.uk>, Ralph Corderoy 
writes:
>
>Picking on the simplest problem first, I'm not aware of this behaviour
>being per folder so I can't explain that unless the +inbox message
>doesn't have a x-spam-report field whereas the +nmh one does.
>
>With the current message in each folder set appropriately, what does
>this give?
>
>    egrep -Him1 '^$|x-spam-report:' `mhpath +inbox .`
>    anno -list -number -component x-spam-report +inbox .
>
>    egrep -Him1 '^$|x-spam-report:' `mhpath +nmh .`
>    anno -list -number -component x-spam-report +nmh .
>
Mr Corderoy - I replied to this message the day I received it. However,
since I do not see my cc in the mailing list I assume something went
wrong and you never got it.

As requested:

/home/slaurel$ folder +inbox
inbox+ has 17 messages  (1-20); cur=2; (others).

/home/slaurel$ egrep -Him1 '^$|x-spam-report:' `mhpath +inbox .`
/home/slaurel/Mail/inbox/2:X-Spam-Report: 

/home/slaurel$ anno -list -number -component x-spam-report +inbox .
1       malware *  0.0 TXREP TXREP: Score normalizing based on sender's 
reputation

/home/slaurel$ folder +nmh
nmh+ has 118 messages  (1-118); cur=118.

/home/slaurel$ egrep -Him1 '^$|x-spam-report:' `mhpath +nmh .`
/home/slaurel/Mail/nmh/118:X-Spam-Report: 

/home/slaurel$ anno -list -number -component x-spam-report +nmh .
1       * -2.5 RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W RBL: Sender listed in HOSTKARMA-WHITE
      *      [209.51.188.17 listed in hostkarma.junkemailfilter.com]  *
-0.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% *      [score:
0.0054]  *  0.1 CK_NAIVER_NO_DNS At least one sender has no verified
rDNS        *      (postfix only)   *  0.0 FORWARD_RELAY Appears to be
relayed through list or forwarding   *  0.6 KAM_COUK Scoring .co.uk
emails higher due to poor registry       *      security.        * -0.0
SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record  * -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO
matches SPF record       *  0.0 ENV_FROM_DIFF0 Envelope From differs
from from (eg list) *  0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and
EnvelopeFrom 2nd level    *      mail domains are different       *  0.1
CK_KARD_SIZE short, card virus size - avoid matches in long      *
text     *  0.0 CK_419SIZE typical 419 size - avoid matches in long text
*  0.0 KAM_DMARC_STATUS Test Rule for DKIM or SPF Failure with Strict
*      Alignment        * -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description
available.   * -0.1 AM_TRUNCATED Compensate on large message for
misfiring rules     * -1.0 MAILING_LIST_MULTI Multiple indicators imply
a widely-seen list  *       manager *  0.1 TXREP TXREP: Score normalizing based 
on sender's reputation
/home/slaurel$ 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]