Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: monotone evaluation in commercial project[long]

[Gerald W. Lester]

Peter Simons wrote:

> Jon Bright writes:
>
> >> If your customer requires access to your code management
> >> system, then this is normally done by having a development
> >> code management system and a release code management
> >> system.
>
> > That would be one way, but why build the SCM so that it
> > needs to be that way?
>
> Particularly, if the SCM system we have happens to know how
> to synchronize de-central repositories with each other and
> authenticates all data with strong cryptography. That's
> pretty much exactly what you need when giving repository
> access to third parties.
>  
But the original poster wanted to give "limited" access to third 
parties, i.e. only wanted the thrid party to be able to see some 
checkins and history.

Example, in his repositor he did twenty checkins to get to V 1.0. He 
only wants the third party to see V 1.0 and no history for the twenty 
checkins.

--
+--------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Gerald W. Lester               | Email: address@hidden        |
| Implementation Engineer        | Work: 504-304-6665, FAX: 504-324-6476 |
+--------------------------------+---------------------------------------+
|"The man who fights for his ideals is the man who is alive." - Cervantes|
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+