Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: monotone evaluation in commercial project[long]

[Timothy Brownawell]

On 4/14/05, Gerald W. Lester <address@hidden> wrote:
> Peter Simons wrote:
> 
> >Jon Bright writes:
> >
> > >> If your customer requires access to your code management
> > >> system, then this is normally done by having a development
> > >> code management system and a release code management
> > >> system.
> >
> > > That would be one way, but why build the SCM so that it
> > > needs to be that way?
> >
> >Particularly, if the SCM system we have happens to know how
> >to synchronize de-central repositories with each other and
> >authenticates all data with strong cryptography. That's
> >pretty much exactly what you need when giving repository
> >access to third parties.
> >
> >
> But the original poster wanted to give "limited" access to third
> parties, i.e. only wanted the thrid party to be able to see some
> checkins and history.
> 
> Example, in his repositor he did twenty checkins to get to V 1.0. He
> only wants the third party to see V 1.0 and no history for the twenty
> checkins.

Maybe change "branch" in MT/options (to, say,
"project.public-releases") and change MT/revision to the current head
of that branch, then checkin?

Tim