[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potential fix for issue 37
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: Potential fix for issue 37 |
|
Date: |
Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:48:26 +0100 (CET) |
> And now for something completely different: when looking at those
> examples, I thought that it might be nice if beam slope was actually
> based on physical pitch rather than note position, so that something
> like f-fis gets slope, and something like eis-f doesn't.
Yes, this would be very helpful, and, IIRC, this is done in manually
engraved pieces too.
Werner
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, (continued)
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/07
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, David Kastrup, 2011/01/07
- RE: Potential fix for issue 37, James Lowe, 2011/01/07
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, David Kastrup, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, David Kastrup, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Andrew Hawryluk, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Mike Solomon, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, David Kastrup, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Carl Sorensen, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/08
Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Neil Puttock, 2011/01/07
Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Jan WarchoĊ, 2011/01/07
Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Mike Solomon, 2011/01/07