[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Potential fix for issue 37
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
RE: Potential fix for issue 37 |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:32:54 +0000 |
________________________________
From: address@hidden address@hidden on behalf of David Kastrup address@hidden
Sent: 07 January 2011 17:15
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Potential fix for issue 37
Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>> I'm not exactly sure what the desired output would be for issue 37,
>> but my code assumes that if there are collision problems, flat beams
>> look best.
>
> +1
Don't agree: the beams usually give an impression of the overall pitch
tendency. Flat beams over a rising melody line look strange and dead.
So I think it would be good if they usually kept their natural angle,
just with uniformly longer stems.
Of course, a flat beam is still better than a collision.
---
So do you agree or not?
;)
James
- Potential fix for issue 37, mike, 2011/01/07
- Potential fix for issue 37, Mike Solomon, 2011/01/07
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/07
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Andrew Hawryluk, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Mike Solomon, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, David Kastrup, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Carl Sorensen, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/08