Re: Potential fix for issue 37

[Mike Solomon]

Not a problem.
Attached is a leaner and meaner patch that requires no other patches (it bases 
off of the master) and implements this.
I've compiled all of the regtests and it breaks none of them.  And, after 
briefly perusing the output, I don't think it drastically changes anything.

Up for review at http://codereview.appspot.com/3927041

Cheers,
MS

0001-Fixing-issue-37-with-extra-position-callback.patch
Description: Binary data

37.robust.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

37.robust.ly
Description: Binary data

On Jan 8, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:

> 2011/1/8 Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
>> BTW, has someone done some research in trying to find printed,
>> well-engraved examples?
> 
> I've only got one off the top of my head, the final example on this page:
> http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/finale-lilypond-2.html
> 
> It's only one data point, but it does argue in favour of a
> sloped-but-damped approach.
> 
> Andrew
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel