[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Potential fix for issue 37
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Potential fix for issue 37 |
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jan 2011 17:37:24 +0000 |
On 7 January 2011 16:14, <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what the desired output would be for issue 37, but my
> code assumes that if there are collision problems, flat beams look best.
>
> Lemme know what you think!
Looks interesting, though you need to do a regression test check to
make sure there are no side-effects.
\relative c' {
c8 d e f
}
This crashes, since the following line
+ if (scm_to_bool (me->get_object ("collides")))
returns a `Wrong type' error for the default case (since 'collides
will return '()). Use to_boolean () instead (and get_property
()/set_property ()).
Cheers,
Neil
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, (continued)
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Andrew Hawryluk, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Mike Solomon, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, David Kastrup, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Carl Sorensen, 2011/01/08
- Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/01/08
Re: Potential fix for issue 37,
Neil Puttock <=
Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Jan WarchoĊ, 2011/01/07
Re: Potential fix for issue 37, Mike Solomon, 2011/01/07