[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: new lilypond repos
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: new lilypond repos |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Jun 2009 20:27:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 08:16:10PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Graham
> Percival<address@hidden> wrote:
> > web/ (new repo)
>
> I think this should be called "lilypond-web" if it's in a separate
> repo. Or else it won't be obvious what "web" refers to.
Well, this would be a sub-repo below the main "lilypond" one, but
I have no objection to calling it "lilypond-web" anyway.
Should we do a similar thing with "lilypond-gub", then?
> I think it makes sense to have "macos-lilypad" separate from GUB,
> since it *is* a separate application. IMO, it should be named
> "lilypad" or "lilypond-lilypad". Maybe the Windows Lilypad should be
> integrated into the same code tree too?
That would be nice, but I have no clue where the windows lilypad
code is. Until/unless they get merged, I favor keeping "macos" in
the name, since it *is* specifically for osx.
Cheers,
- Graham