Re: [Gomp-discuss] sentinels

[Lars Segerlund]

 Ok, the C frontend is fine with me, and then we should wait for Scott 
for more info.

 The question is how do we go about our modifications ? this as relates 
to the code changed, shall we keep private copies of some files which we 
use for the compilation of a omp capable gcc ? What I was thinking was 
to have a set of the files we change and mangle the build system ? In 
this way all our code is non-invasive to the rest of gcc ?

 I would prefer if we could keep all our code contained in our own 
directory, what is the opinion here ?

 Finally, when do we start ?

 Thoughts ?

Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Op di 04-02-2003, om 09:43 schreef Lars Segerlund:
...[snip]...
> I think the Fortran stuff can wait.  G95 is nowhere near complete and
> like I told you in a private discussion, the g95 parser is basically a
> template matcher that is to brittle that I would rather not touch it for
> a while.
>
> So IMHO it would be best to start with the C front end.  The sooner we
> can show off our Great Effort to the GCC community, the more support
> we're likely to get, so I think we should be in GCC CVS.  Some
> sub-branch from the tree-ssa branch to 1) implement the OMP C pragmas
> and 2) Define the tree codes to go with that?
...[snip]...
> Agree.  We can make the middle end just ignore the extra information for
> now, that's always legal.
>  
...[snip]...
> Scott said he would have a look at the differences between Fortran on
> the one hand and C/C++ on the other.  I suggest we wait for him to draw
> conclusions and then decide which directives to implement first.
>
> Greetz
> Steven