Re: question about historical GNU System releases

[Michael Banck]

On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 10:56:52AM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 03:54:22PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> 
> > GNU 0.3 has to be at least on par with the bumpiest GNU/Linux
> > distributions out there a couple of years.  "But GNU 0.2 was even
> > worse" isn't going to be accepted as excuse.
> 
> Bullshit. 0.3 is just that: 0.3. Anyone who puts expectations into a 0.3
> release beyond surpassing 0.2, is a moron, and really deserves
> disappointment.

Are you calling me a moron?


Michael