[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Apr 2006 06:27:04 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 09:15:36AM -0700, Thomas Lord wrote:
> I don't mean to pick on Ludovic or anyone else but this subthread is
> starting to talk mostly about implementation issues and political
> structures of the project, etc.
>
> I'd like to suggest sticking to the three questions:
> 1. Target Market?
Software developers - Primary
Sysadmins - Secondary
> 2. Target Market Needs?
Speed. - Too slow, no adoption
Simplicity - Complex UI, slow adoption
Portability. - No Windows - wait ten years to start.
No Mac OS X - wait twenty years to start.
> 3. "Business" Model?
- Scratch your own itch
- Can't scratch your own? Pay someone else
I'm a little confused. Isn't Andy in charge?
--
My home page: <a href="http://jblack.linuxguru.net">James Blackwell</a>
Gnupg 06357400 F-print AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Karel Gardas, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, John Arbash Meinel, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?,
James Blackwell <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, James Blackwell, 2006/04/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Andy Tai, 2006/04/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, James Blackwell, 2006/04/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Andy Tai, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Matteo Settenvini, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21