[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:12:23 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Hi,
Peter Conrad <address@hidden> writes:
> any software should be targeting its users' needs, not the political
> goals of the supporting organization.
Well, whether you like it or not, the GNU project _is_ political.
> Hard links are an optimization. tla works (or could work) fine
> without them.
Right, but this optimization has a significant impact on performance.
> Long paths aren't neccessary for a good archive format, so I wouldn't
> call the path length an "unacceptable design constraint".
Right, the archive format could probably be modified to be less
demanding on path length.
That said, this really is a limitation, I'd even say a flaw, of the
underlying OS. You wouldn't want to worry about 8.3 file names for
instance, would you?
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, (continued)
[Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Thomas Lord, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Andy Tai, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Mark Flacy, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/04/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Karel Gardas, 2006/04/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, John Arbash Meinel, 2006/04/21
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/21