Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...)

[Andy Tai]

On 4/20/06, Aldrik KLEBER <address@hidden> wrote:

        For the moment Arch with tla is limited to POSIX environment, should we
considered that it is a ARCH requirement, or on only a caracteristic of the
first implementation of ARCH ? Should we imagine that ARCH can be open to non
POSIX SYSTEM (Mainframe, etc ...) ?

I think it is well agreed that the current tla's
strong ties to "certain aspects" (but not all) of the POSIX environment
is a weakness and to work well on Microsoft Windows is a desired
feature for Arch 2.0 and Tom's prototype clearly shows that.


Andy Tai, address@hidden