[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:29:55 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) XEmacs/21.4.19 (linux) |
>>>>> "John" == John Arbash Meinel <address@hidden> writes:
John> Jeremy Shaw wrote:
>> darcs get has a --partial flag:
John> Can it annotate files if you have a --partial? And how well
John> does it handle merging under those conditions?
"No", and "very likely barfs". All annotation history is in the
patches, since that's the whole repo---there's not very much metadata
in darcs outside the patches.
If the common ancestor can be constructed by patching up from the
checkpoint, the merge will succeed. Otherwise, not. (There was some
talk of adding "backbuilder" capability, but I don't think it actually
happened yet.)
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2006/04/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, Thomas Lord, 2006/04/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, Jeremy Shaw, 2006/04/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code, John Arbash Meinel, 2006/04/19
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Google Summer of Code,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
[Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Thomas Lord, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Andy Tai, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0? (was re: Google...), Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Peter Conrad, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Ludovic Courtès, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Mark Flacy, 2006/04/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] planning 2.0?, Aldrik KLEBER, 2006/04/21