[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft)
From: |
Jeremy Shaw |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft) |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:01:01 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.11.30 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:11:47 -0700 (PDT),
Thomas Lord wrote:
[snip]
> ** Casual Changes and Patch Log Entries
>
> NOTE: When casual changes are merged into the mainline
>
> NO PATCH LOG ENTRIES FROM THE CONTRIBUTOR WILL BE
> INCLUDED IN THE MERGE.
[snip]
> For each cascade being merged into the mainline, the patch log of
> the most recently merged step will be retained in the mainline, and
> all earlier patch logs from the same version will be removed.
Can you give a brief explaination of why the patch logs are removed ?
I don't object -- I just don't feel like I understand the purpose.
Thanks!
Jeremy Shaw.
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft),
Jeremy Shaw <=
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Thomas Lord, 2004/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Thomas Lord, 2004/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Thomas Lord, 2004/10/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), James Blackwell, 2004/10/03