[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft)
|
From: |
Andrew Suffield |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 3 Oct 2004 14:01:23 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 07:40:30PM -0700, Thomas Lord wrote:
>
> > From: Andrew Suffield <address@hidden>
> [bug goo headers]
>
>
> Buggoo is, at this point, too under-/informally-specified to have a
> meaningful discussion about appropriate allocation of non "X-" header
> field names.
'X-' is mindless IETF namespace tyranny to no useful end, and should
be ignored.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Jeremy Shaw, 2004/10/02
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/02
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), James Blackwell, 2004/10/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Matthew Dempsky, 2004/10/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Harald Meland, 2004/10/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] NEW POLICIES (draft), Andrew Suffield, 2004/10/04