[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tla spork
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tla spork |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Aug 2004 12:30:41 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: address@hidden (James Blackwell)
> The problem with "tla fork" as a command is that the word sounds much
> too deep and serious. "Ohhh. I don't want to fork this guy. I just want
> to work on my local copy". A spork, on the other hand, is one of
> humanity's best jokes. Even better, conceptually, a "spork" is basically
> a fork with really shallow prongs.
Oh, please, please, please leave the identifier "spork" for me?!?!
I mean, that's funny as hell and I think i have a great use for it but
it's a little hard to explain right at this instant.
Can I reserve "spork" for 6m? :-)
-t
- [Gnu-arch-users] Creating and joining branches..., Esben Mose Hansen, 2004/08/11
- [Gnu-arch-users] Tla spork, James Blackwell, 2004/08/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tla spork,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tla spork, Tom Lord, 2004/08/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tla spork, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tla spork, Miles Bader, 2004/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tla spork, Tom Lord, 2004/08/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tla spork, Miles Bader, 2004/08/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Tla spork, Matthew Dempsky, 2004/08/24