Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

freetype-devel (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Mon Oct 31 2005 14:41:11 -0500 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, mpsuzuki, 2005/10/27
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Christian Demmer, 2005/10/27
    • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/27
  • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/27
  • RE: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Steven Johnson, 2005/10/27
    • RE: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, George Williams, 2005/10/27
  • RE: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Steven Johnson, 2005/10/27
    • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, mpsuzuki, 2005/10/28
      • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, George Williams, 2005/10/28
      • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Masatake YAMATO, 2005/10/28
      • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, mpsuzuki, 2005/10/28
      • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Sean McBride, 2005/10/28
  • RE: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, Turner, David, 2005/10/28
    • Re: [ft-devel] "comp" is reserved word in Apple SC compiler?, mpsuzuki, 2005/10/28
• [ft-devel] Question on glyph outline rendering for openType, sachidanand, 2005/10/26
  • Re: [ft-devel] Question on glyph outline rendering for openType, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/28
• [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., sunmoon1997, 2005/10/26
  • Re: [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/26
    • Re: [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., Chia-I Wu, 2005/10/26
      • Re: [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., sunmoon1997, 2005/10/26
    • Re: [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., sunmoon1997, 2005/10/27
  • RE: [ft-devel] FT_Glyphslot_Embolden is broken at sometimes., Turner, David, 2005/10/27
• [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Hisashi T Fujinaka, 2005/10/26
  • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/26
    • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Hisashi T Fujinaka, 2005/10/26
      • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/26
      • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Hisashi T Fujinaka, 2005/10/26
      • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/27
      • Re: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Hisashi T Fujinaka, 2005/10/27
  • RE: [ft-devel] non-standard commenting in tttables.h, Turner, David, 2005/10/27
• [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), mpsuzuki, 2005/10/24
  • Re: [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/25
    • Re: [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), mpsuzuki, 2005/10/25
  • Re: [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), Sean McBride, 2005/10/25
    • Re: [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), mpsuzuki, 2005/10/25
      • Re: [ft-devel] update CodeWarrior project file (builds/mac/ftlib.prj), Sean McBride, 2005/10/25
• [ft-devel] Segfault in FT_Get_Kerning ifndef TT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES, Tony J. Ibbs, 2005/10/21
  • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault in FT_Get_Kerning ifndef TT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/26
• [ft-devel] otf2bdf 3.0 - second preview version, Mark Leisher, 2005/10/20
• [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 2005/10/17
  • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, David Turner, 2005/10/17
    • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 2005/10/17
      • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 2005/10/17
      • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, David Turner, 2005/10/17
      • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 2005/10/17
      • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 2005/10/20
  • RE: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Turner, David, 2005/10/21
    • Re: [ft-devel] Segfault with otf and face_index == -1, Ville Syrjälä, 2005/10/31
• [ft-devel] font file converter, Mark DeVries, 2005/10/17
  • Re: [ft-devel] font file converter, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/17
  • Re: [ft-devel] font file converter, George Williams, 2005/10/17
  • Re: [ft-devel] font file converter, James Cloos, 2005/10/17
• Re: [ft-devel] Structure Viewer for TTF files, Masatake YAMATO, 2005/10/16
• [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, Fujinaka, Todd, 2005/10/14
  • Re: [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/14
  • RE: [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, Fujinaka, Todd, 2005/10/14
  • RE: [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, Fujinaka, Todd, 2005/10/19
    • RE: [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, George Williams, 2005/10/19
      • Re: [ft-devel] Is there an easy way to figure out which module a function or declaration is in?, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/20
• [ft-devel] Export services?, Chia-I Wu, 2005/10/14
  • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/14
    • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, Chia-I Wu, 2005/10/14
      • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/15
  • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, David Turner, 2005/10/15
    • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, Chia-I Wu, 2005/10/14
      • Re: [ft-devel] Export services?, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/15
  • RE: [ft-devel] Export services?, Turner, David, 2005/10/17
    • [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Graham Asher, 2005/10/17
      • Re: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/17
      • RE: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Graham Asher, 2005/10/17
      • RE: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Graham Asher, 2005/10/17
      • Re: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/17
      • Re: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, David Turner, 2005/10/17
      • RE: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, Graham Asher, 2005/10/17
      • Re: [ft-devel] FreeType compatibility with C++ managed extensions, George Williams, 2005/10/17
• [ft-devel] About customization of freetype for BDF, Kiran Mahajan, 2005/10/14
  • Re: [ft-devel] About customization of freetype for BDF, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/14
    • Re: [ft-devel] About customization of freetype for BDF, David Turner, 2005/10/15
      • Re: [ft-devel] About customization of freetype for BDF, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/15
• [ft-devel] more FT_INTERNAL removal, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/13
  • [ft-devel] more FT_INTERNAL removal, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/17
    • Re: [ft-devel] more FT_INTERNAL removal, David Turner, 2005/10/17
      • Re: [ft-devel] more FT_INTERNAL removal, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/18
• Re: [ft-devel] Compilation fixes for FreeType on BeOS, Christian Biesinger, 2005/10/11
  • Re: [ft-devel] Compilation fixes for FreeType on BeOS, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/12
• [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Banginwar, Rajesh, 2005/10/07
  • Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, George Williams, 2005/10/07
    • [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [1], Ulrich, 2005/10/08
      • Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [1], George Williams, 2005/10/08
      • [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [2], Ulrich, 2005/10/28
      • Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [2], George Williams, 2005/10/28
      • [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [4], Ulrich, 2005/10/28
      • Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [4], George Williams, 2005/10/28
  • Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/12
  • RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Fujinaka, Todd, 2005/10/10
    • RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, George Williams, 2005/10/10
  • RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Turner, David, 2005/10/12
  • FW: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Fujinaka, Todd, 2005/10/12
• [ft-devel] Illegal cff font, George Williams, 2005/10/05
  • Re: [ft-devel] Illegal cff font, George Williams, 2005/10/05
  • Re: [ft-devel] Illegal cff font, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/06
• [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/03
  • Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, mpsuzuki, 2005/10/03
    • Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/03
  • Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/04
  • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Turner, David, 2005/10/06
    • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Behdad Esfahbod, 2005/10/06
    • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Frederic Crozat, 2005/10/06
    • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/06
    • Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Lars Knoll, 2005/10/06
    • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/07
      • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/13
  • RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Turner, David, 2005/10/06
• [ft-devel] How to determine if patented hinting is enabled?, Huw D M Davies, 2005/10/03
  • Re: [ft-devel] How to determine if patented hinting is enabled?, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/05
• Re: [ft-devel] Digital signatures, Martin Hosken, 2005/10/03
  • Re: [ft-devel] Digital signatures, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/04
    • Re: [ft-devel] Digital signatures, David Somers, 2005/10/04

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc