[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2
From: |
mpsuzuki |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2 |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:18:33 +0900 |
Hi,
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:24:49 -0400
Matthias Clasen <address@hidden> wrote:
> - Does FT_OPTIMIZE_MEMORY still break apps ? I know that Pango
> has been patched, but I hear xfs segfaults with the memory
> optimizations. Are there patches beyond the (applied) pango
> patches to fix breakage due to this ?
Yet I'm unfamiliar with the reason why they want to use
FT_OPTIMIZE_MEMORY, if you know, please let me know.
If it's something like "maximum optimization is required",
is there any benchmark tests comparing FreeType with/without
FT_OPTIMIZE_MEMORY?
Regards,
mpsuzuki
- [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/03
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Turner, David, 2005/10/06
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Behdad Esfahbod, 2005/10/06
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Frederic Crozat, 2005/10/06
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/06
- Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Lars Knoll, 2005/10/06
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/07
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Turner, David, 2005/10/06