[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB
From: |
George Williams |
Subject: |
RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB |
Date: |
10 Oct 2005 17:27:18 -0700 |
On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 16:37, Fujinaka, Todd wrote:
> I may have done something wrong, but those tests take an incredibly long
> time.
Oh, they never end. It keeps churning out random tests and saving the
few that cause problems.
>
> I think the tests we need are just something to test to see that all of
> the interfaces for freetype that are specified in the LSB spec are
> present and functioning. The degree of functioning is something I'm not
> clear on, but I think the first pass will be just to find the presence
> of the interface and basic operation.
>
> I don't suppose there's any existing tests for that.
Not that I'm aware of.
- [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Banginwar, Rajesh, 2005/10/07
- Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, George Williams, 2005/10/07
- [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [1], Ulrich, 2005/10/08
- Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [1], George Williams, 2005/10/08
- [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [2], Ulrich, 2005/10/28
- Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [2], George Williams, 2005/10/28
- [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [4], Ulrich, 2005/10/28
- Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB [4], George Williams, 2005/10/28
Re: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Werner LEMBERG, 2005/10/12
- RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Fujinaka, Todd, 2005/10/10
- RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB,
George Williams <=
- RE: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Turner, David, 2005/10/12
- FW: [ft-devel] Revisiting LSB, Fujinaka, Todd, 2005/10/12