[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2
From: |
Matthias Clasen |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2 |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:34:04 -0400 |
On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 09:18 +0900, address@hidden wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 14:24:49 -0400
> Matthias Clasen <address@hidden> wrote:
> > - Does FT_OPTIMIZE_MEMORY still break apps ? I know that Pango
> > has been patched, but I hear xfs segfaults with the memory
> > optimizations. Are there patches beyond the (applied) pango
> > patches to fix breakage due to this ?
>
> Yet I'm unfamiliar with the reason why they want to use
> FT_OPTIMIZE_MEMORY, if you know, please let me know.
> If it's something like "maximum optimization is required",
> is there any benchmark tests comparing FreeType with/without
> FT_OPTIMIZE_MEMORY?
You can look at
http://www.advogato.org/person/freetype/diary.html?start=15
for some impressive numbers.
Matthias
- [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/03
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Turner, David, 2005/10/06
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Behdad Esfahbod, 2005/10/06
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Frederic Crozat, 2005/10/06
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/06
- Re: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Lars Knoll, 2005/10/06
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Matthias Clasen, 2005/10/07
- RE: [ft-devel] Status of 2.2, Turner, David, 2005/10/06